The Unofficial Opie & Anthony Message Board
Home | Search | FAQ


The Unofficial Opie & Anthony Message Board - fu to those bastards

Page 1 2 3
Displaying 51-63 of 63 messages in this thread.
Posted ByDiscussion Topic: fu to those bastards
Cunt-Twat
No real… its cool to wear childrens Band-Aids.
I'm not a Cockblocker, I'm a COCKSUCKER!
posted on 12-05-2001 @ 10:42 PM      
O&A Board Regular
Registered: Jan. 01
in regard t being a second class citizen, i am speaking about myself. the jews in europe didn't consider themselves second class citizens, but hitler did, if that. i'm not saying that today in america jews are or are not. i was simply speaking on my own behalf.
quote:

if you have never been to palestine to see how the palestinian people live, i think that it's unjust for you to blame the israelis.

am, arafat has received $400 million from the american govt since 1993, he has done nothing to better the lives of the palestinian people. much like saddam hussain, he treats his people like crap so that they will not no any better. many of the arab countries are like that. the paletinians blame the israelis cuz they can't get to any of the israeli hospitals. well where are are the palestinian hospitals?? why are only israeli hospitals good enough for them?? do americans go to canada's er's?? i don't, i don't know about you. again, i have no problem with the innocent palestinian people, who just want to work, and carry on their lives. i do have a problem with the terroerist organization known as the palestinain authority.

==============================
Remember-Laughter heals.
adolescentmasturbator
posted on 12-05-2001 @ 11:06 PM      
O&A Board Regular
Registered: Jan. 01
Am I applauding Arafat? No, he's got a lot of problems himself. He has a created a very inefficent system of government that is weak.

BTW, It's been documented that the IDF has stopped Palestininian ambulances and interrogated ems workers that were trying to save lives.

You consider the PA terrorist but they certainly pale in comparison to the Israeli government IMO. But that's just my opinion.


Resident Board Socialist
IM me at stickysituation2
Cunt-Twat
No real… its cool to wear childrens Band-Aids.
I'm not a Cockblocker, I'm a COCKSUCKER!
posted on 12-06-2001 @ 7:09 AM      
O&A Board Regular
Registered: Jan. 01
quote:

BTW, It's been documented that the IDF has stopped Palestininian ambulances and interrogated ems workers that were trying to save lives.


that's cuz when they ambulances weren't interogated, they were often packed with terrorist that when arrived on the scene would open fire on the soldiers.
quote:

You consider the PA terrorist but they certainly pale in comparison to the Israeli government IMO. But that's just my opinion.


everyone is entitled to their opinion, and the opinion of arafat was to distroy israel since the 1950's, when he founded his fatah organization. my fu is still on arafat and the terrorist organizations, not the palestinian people, that are trying to get on with their lives.

==============================
Remember-Laughter heals.
PeterDragon
posted on 12-06-2001 @ 12:11 PM      
O&A Board Regular
Registered: Jan. 01
quote:

So are you saying the USA, Britain, France, etc. all make Jews second class citizens?



France - notoriously anti-semitic. (also anti-american to a degree)

Currently things in america may be relatively fine for Jewish citizens, but not always been that way (just rent "Gentlemen's Agreement").

Most Jewish Americans are accepted if they are not too "ethnic". Of course, the same could probably be said for Italian americans, or Irish Americans, etc.

This though, is a separate issue.

This cartoon was in the Dec 5th Newsday















This message was edited by PeterDragon on 12-6-01 @ 8:12 PM
adolescentmasturbator
posted on 12-06-2001 @ 6:35 PM      
O&A Board Regular
Registered: Jan. 01
quote:

that's cuz when they ambulances weren't interogated, they were often packed with terrorist that when arrived on the scene would open fire on the soldiers.


I've never heard of this. Some linkage would be appreciated.


Resident Board Socialist
IM me at stickysituation2
Cunt-Twat
No real… its cool to wear childrens Band-Aids.
I'm not a Cockblocker, I'm a COCKSUCKER!
posted on 12-07-2001 @ 9:00 AM      
O&A Board Regular
Registered: Jan. 01
am, i am searching the israeli news archives, but they only have archives rom 2001, not from last year. i did send an email asking them to send me the links or articles. as soon as i hear back, i'll be more than happy to post them.

but here's something you might find intersting.

The Myth of "Occupied" Territories

Boris Shusteff
May 16, 2001

One of the most misused, misapplied, and misunderstood definitions in the dictionary of the Arab-Israeli conflict is the term "occupied territories." The vast majority of people simply do not know the facts or misinterpret them, thus completely distorting the real picture of the land distribution between the Arabs and the Jews. The truth of the matter is that, according to international law, the Jews have the complete and unquestionable right to settle the territories of Judea, Samaria and Gaza (collectively known as Yesha). Not a single enforceable international document exists that forbids them from settling the lands of Yesha.

On the contrary, the only existing enforceable document actually encourages Jewish settlement. This document was created on April 24, 1920 at the San Remo Conference when the Principal Allied Powers agreed to assign the Mandate for the territory of Palestine to Great Britain. By doing so the League of Nations "recognized the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine" and established "grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country." Article 6 of the Mandate "encouraged ... close settlement by Jews on the land," including the lands of Judea, Samaria and Gaza (Yesha).

There is nothing whatsoever in the Mandate that separates Yesha from the rest of the mandated territory. That means that the right of the Jews to settle the land spreads to the whole of Palestine. As a side note it is worth mentioning that the 76% of the territory of Mandated Palestine known today as Jordan, were not permanently exempt from settlement by the Jews either. Article 25 only allowed to "postpone or withhold application of [this] provision."

With the disbanding of the League of Nations, the rights of the Jews to settle the territories of Palestine, including Yesha, were not hurt. When in 1946 the United Nations was created in place of the League of Nations, its Charter included Article 80 specifically to allow the continuation of existing Mandates (including the British Mandate). Article 80 stated that "nothing ... shall be construed in or of itself to alter in any manner the rights whatsoever ... of any peoples or the terms of existing international instruments to which Members of the United Nations may respectively be parties."

Then in November 1947 came time for Resolution 181, which recommended the Partition of Palestine. Like all UN Resolutions pertaining to the Jewish-Arab conflict it was not enforceable. It was simply a recommendation, and the Arab countries rejected it. As the Syrian representative in the General Assembly stated:

"In the first place the recommendations of the General Asembly are not imperative on those to whom they are addressed... . The General Assembly only gives advice and the parties to whom advice is addressed accept it when it is rightful and just and when it does not impair their fundamental rights" (1).

If the resolution had been implemented maybe it would be possible to argue that it replaced the San Remo Conference resolution, which had legitimized the rights of the Jews to settle in any place in Palestine. However, it was not only rejected by the Arabs, but in violation of the UN Charter they launched a military aggression against the newly reborn Jewish state thus invalidating the resolution. By the time of the cease-fire at the end of the War of Independence there was still no other enforceable document pertaining to the rights of the Jews to settle Eretz Yisrael - they remained intact.

Now we approach the most misunderstood aspect of the scope and application of international documents. In order to resolve the puzzle of the "occupied" territories, one must clearly distinguish between the different types of resolutions passed by the United Nations. Misconceptions about the issue led to the question of a double standard that was constantly raised by the Arabs after the Persian Gulf War. The Arabs were unable to understand why from Iraq the UN demanded compliance with the decisions of the international body, while Israel was not forced to comply with UN resolutions.

On April 3, 1998 Swedish Foreign Minister Lena Hjelm-Wallen, well known for championing the Arabs' position, in an interview with the London al-Quds al-'Arabi, gave an explanation of this "paradox." She was asked, "What about the double standards that the United States and Europe adopt when it comes to Arab issues?" She answered,

"I understand this view, which is common in many Arab countries. Nevertheless, the UN resolutions passed on Iraq are different, because they are binding for all nations according to Article 7 of the UN Charter. Meanwhile, the resolutions passed against Israel are not subject to Article 7 of the Charter."

To better understand the way UN resolutions work, it is worth reading an open letter by Uri Lubrani, coordinator of Israeli activities in Lebanon, addressed to Lebanon's Foreign Minister Faris Buwayz and published on February 27, 1998 in the Paris newspaper al Watan al-'Arabi. Although the letter was written regarding Resolution 425, it talks about all resolutions pertaining to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Uri Lubrani wrote the following,

"...There are two types of resolutions in the Security Council. The first type are resolutions passed on the basis of Chapter Six of the UN charter that relates to the settlement of disputes through peaceful means. Such resolutions are considered recommendations. They are not binding, and they do not require immediate implementation... . The second type of resolutions are based on Chapter Seven of the UN charter... . This chapter grants the UN Security Council resolutions an implementative authority and commits the international community to use force if necessary to implement these resolutions. ...None of the UN Security Council resolutions pertaining to the Arab Israeli conflict, including Resolution 425, were passed on the basis of Chapter Seven. They were passed on the basis of Chapter Six of the UN charter, which is the basis also of UNSC Resolutions 242 and 338."

Since no mandatory UN Resolution exists pertaining to the Arab-Israeli conflict, we are left with the San Remo Conference decision that governs land ownership in Palestine. That means that not a single enforceable internationally valid document exists that prevents or prohibits the Jews from settling anywhere in Judea, Samaria, Gaza and all the rest of Eretz Yisrael. Or, to put it differently, from the standpoint of international law FOR THE JEWS IT IS NOT AN OCCUPIED LAND.

This conclusion was confirmed not long ago by an unexpected (for Israel) source. It is hard to argue with the fact that James Baker, former US Secretary of State, was not the best friend of the Jewish state. However, he categorically rejected the mislabeling of the lands of Yesha. This happened at the Middle East Insight Symposium in Washington on May 4, 1998. Hoda Tawfik, from the newspaper Al Ahram asked him, "What do you think is right? That these are occupied Arab territories and not disputed territories?" Baker replied, "They're clearly disputed territories. That's what Resolutions 242 and 338 are all about. They are clearly disputed territories."

All of this means that when the Jews build settlements in Yesha, they are not building them on "occupied" territories. If one wants, one may call them "disputed" territories, as Baker did. However, this will still not change the fact that from the standpoint of international law it is the very land where the Jews were encouraged to settle.

And as a final note, it should not be surprising that the San Remo Conference plays such an important role in this particular case. The majority of the other players in the conflict: Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Jordan, etc. gained sovereignty over their territories based on the decisions of exactly the same conference. The Jews finally deserve to settle freely on their territories as well. It is time to stop labeling them "occupied".

1. Abba Eban. Voice of Israel. Horizon Press, New York, 1957.







==============================
Remember-Laughter heals.
quote:





This message was edited by Cunt-Twat on 12-7-01 @ 9:25 AM
adolescentmasturbator
posted on 12-08-2001 @ 11:05 AM      
O&A Board Regular
Registered: Jan. 01
Hmm if we are talking about International law then Israel is supposed to pull out out of the "disputed" territories. Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't even the Israeli government call it the Occupied territories?


Resident Board Socialist
IM me at stickysituation2
Cunt-Twat
No real… its cool to wear childrens Band-Aids.
I'm not a Cockblocker, I'm a COCKSUCKER!
posted on 12-08-2001 @ 8:50 PM      
O&A Board Regular
Registered: Jan. 01
am, hopefully tomorrow i'll get the link to the article regarding the red crescent ambulances. as for the issue of "occupied" territory, the leftist parties (labor, meretz, etc) say that if there will be a genuine peace with the palestinains, then, they will no longer "occupy" the west bank and gaza. they believe that israel should withdraw from that area for peace. but as we have seen in the last year and a half, there is no peace. ehud barak offered almost all of the land, only to have his ofer refused by arafat last july. so it's your call, i guess. you can think of the west bank as being occupied/disputed territory, i however do not.

here you go am, it's from the jerusalem post, 10/30/00
quote:

WJC: Palestinian Red Crescent helps rioters
By Arieh O'Sullivan and Reuters


TEL AVIV (November 5) - The World Jewish Congress on Friday accused the Palestinian Red Crescent of using ambulances to ferry rocks to rioters.

The Jewish advocacy group added it will ask the American Red Cross to warn the Palestinian aid society that unless it stopped giving rocks to Palestinians and Israeli Arabs to throw at Israeli soldiers, it will shut off supplies of medical equipment.

Elan Steinberg, the WJC's executive director, said: "We are asking the American Red Cross to warn the Palestine Red Crescent to cease such behavior... or risk losing the bilateral aid the American Red Cross has been providing them."

Leslie Van Sant, a spokeswoman for the Washington, DC-based American Red Cross, declined comment.

The army also listed at least four other occasions during the past two weeks when Red Crescent ambulances were involved in shooting incidents against Israelis:

* On October 30, Red Crescent ambulances were used to ferry Palestinians to protests with the IDF near the Karni crossing in the Gaza Strip.

* On October 27, Red Crescent ambulances transferred armed Palestinian police to friction points with the IDF, also near the Karni crossing.

* On October 27, a Red Crescent ambulance arrived in the midst of a gun battle between IDF soldiers and Palestinian gunmen near the village of Kafr Klil near Nablus bringing armed Palestinians who joined the fight.

* On October 22, a Palestinian gunman fired at the Jewish settlement in Hebron and fled in a Red Crescent ambulance.








==============================
Remember-Laughter heals.

This message was edited by Cunt-Twat on 12-8-01 @ 11:41 PM
adolescentmasturbator
posted on 12-09-2001 @ 12:20 AM      
O&A Board Regular
Registered: Jan. 01
Barak's plan involved settlements all across Palestine basically having this network in between everything.

And that article just says that the WJC and army is accusing them of doing that.


Resident Board Socialist
IM me at stickysituation2
Cunt-Twat
No real… its cool to wear childrens Band-Aids.
I'm not a Cockblocker, I'm a COCKSUCKER!
posted on 12-09-2001 @ 8:43 AM      
O&A Board Regular
Registered: Jan. 01
there's another article in the haaratz paper as well from 11/28/00, but i can't get ther full article online, for some reason. i'm still waiting for a reply from an israeli radio station email, arutz 7, so if and when i get that, i'll post it. btw, i found the article when i did a search for the red crescent, so a few such articles came up on it.

here's something else you might find intresting.
quote:

How To Win a War
by David Wilder
December 3, 2001

Shalom.

Unfortunately, the events of the past few days, as sad as they are, and
as
horrific as they are, do not come as any surprise. In truth, the
surprise
is that we are not burying 50 people a day, G-d forbid, due to such
terror
attacks. From the very beginning it was clear that the ceremonies on the
White House lawn would lead to one thing, and one thing alone – war.

It’s not nice to say “I told you so.” However a virtue politeness may be
on
a personal level, on a public stage, nothing could be worse. Don’t get me
wrong – not saying “I told you so” haughtily, for personal gain, but
rather in
order to learn from the mistakes, correct them, and not err again is
appropriate.

Time and time again, in reply to correspondents' questions, I answered,
as
did many others in various organizations, “the Oslo process can and will
lead to inevitable war. It is only a question of time.” Why? The answer
I
gave is identical to that printed in Charles Krauthammer’s latest column
called “They just don’t get it” printed in today’s Jerusalem Post.
Krauthammer quotes the editor of the Middle East Quarterly, Martin
Kramer,
speaking less than a month ago about American actions against the
Taliban:
“The way to tame the Arab streets is not with appeasement and sweet
sensitivity but with raw power and victory, ” and concludes that the
question is “whether America commands respect or contempt.”

So it is with the Arabs – if you show strength, they may not like you,
but
they will surely respect you. If, on the other hand, you show weakness,
their reaction is one of total contempt. This is the reason that Olso
inevitably leads to war, because Oslo is the preeminent example of
weakness,
continued acquiescence, and total concession, giving and receiving
nothing
in return, leading to Arab derision and mockery, as Arafat has made so
clear
over the past years, months and days.

So today, what is the solution?

First of all Israel’s leadership must recognize the current fighting, not
as
combat, rather as war. This military conflict is the Oslo War, nothing
less.

So far Israeli politicians have refused to define the conflict, and of
course, this is a major error. The enemy has declared war on us, and as
long
as we ignore their declaration we continue on the path of weakness,
thereby attracting continued scorn and hatred, leading to further acts of
war and killing, as we have witnessed over the past 48 hours.

Once the war is recognized and declared, our leadership must act
responsibly. That means that the Defense minister does not publicly
confirm
that “we don’t want to kill Arafat and destroy the palestinian
authority.”
Whether or not these are goals of the war is irrelevant. Much of war is
psychological – why not let Arafat and his cronies think that we are
after
their necks? As long as Israel declares that the Arab leadership is not
the
target and that the p a is safe from destruction, they will easily absorb
whatever Israel does have in mind for them. But, if they have reason to
suspect that their own lives are on the line and that the so-called
‘palestinian state’ is in jeopardy, it is an entirely different story. So
Israel’s defense minister, Fuad, would be much better shutting up, rather
than revealing all his cards to the enemy.

What next? In war, as in war. The object must be to totally defeat the
enemy – the enemy, starting with Arafat, continuing with his thugs,
including Rajoub, Dachlan, Abu-this and Abu-that, leading to the downfall
of
the largest terrorist framework in the world, the palestinian authority.
Those leaders who are not eliminated must be evicted, as far from here as
is
possible. And they must know that should they decide to return, even to
Lebanon or Jordan, their lives will be in jeopardy.

The Israeli left, in its obtrusive manner, then asks, “but what of the
palestinian people, what will happen to them?”

The time has come to formally recognize that there is no palestinian
people,
they have never existed, they are a figment of our imagination, the fruit
of
years of Arafat deceit. The so-called palestinians are Arabs, who have
nothing more in common than their language and religion. They have never
had
a homeland, and certainly not in Eretz Yisrael. Search in history books
from
the 1940s, 50s, 60s, even 70s and find references to the palestinian
people.
They will not be found, because they do not exist.

Arabs who are willing to live peacefully with us, in the State of Israel,
who recognize Israel as a Jewish state, may stay. They are entitled to
human
rights, just as any other human being. However, they may not serve in our
Knesset or vote in our elections. This is a prerequisite for their
residency
here. Israel’s parliament, the Knesset, today has members who literally
belong to enemy forces. Israel is probably the only country in the world
who
allows the enemy to function, with immunity, in its supreme law-making
body.
This must come to an end.

Any Arab who is incapable of accepting Israeli rule in the Jewish state
must
leave. Israel is the only Jewish state on earth, composed of just over
10,000 square miles. All Arab states surrounding Israel, 23 in number,
consist of almost 2,300,000 square miles. Israel, smaller than the state
of
New Jersey, could fit into Lake Ontario. Arabs who do not want to live
here
have where to go. We don’t.

Any Arab who is unwilling to live peacefully with us, abiding by our
conditions, and who does not leave must know that he will be treated
accordingly.

Last, but surely not least – perhaps most importantly, the people of
Israel,
the Jewish people, both those living in the State of Israel and around
the
world, must recognize that the Land of Israel belongs to us, it is our
home,
it is our legitimate right to be here, in all our land, and not only
doesn’t
anyone have the right to take it away from us, but neither do we have the
right to relinquish it to anyone. This is our land. Having so declared,
we
will not need to fight a war, because our enemies, realizing our
convictions, realizing our strength, will pick up and leave.

With blessings from Hebron.



==============================
Remember-Laughter heals.


This message was edited by Cunt-Twat on 12-9-01 @ 10:04 AM
adolescentmasturbator
posted on 12-09-2001 @ 1:00 PM      
O&A Board Regular
Registered: Jan. 01
I won't quote because that would just waste space. But...

This guy is saying peace leads to war? Hmm. Yeah I like the there are no Palestinians thing. When you are oppressing someone it's always great to state they don't really exist(i.e Turkey with the Kurds). BTW 20% of Palestinians are Christians so that BS argument about them sharing the same religon is wrong. And this thinly veiled racism is just appalling. So we don't kill you can't be in Politics. You do realize that a great way to oppress someone is to strip them of political power. Why doesn't he just say outright that Israelis are better than Arabs in every way.


Resident Board Socialist
IM me at stickysituation2
DevilsFan
posted on 12-18-2001 @ 9:04 AM      
Psychopath
Registered: Oct. 01
F Walker, that treasonist mother f'er.
Let him die just like the rest.
All for one and one for all.
You're going down, the whole lot of you scum, and you know who you are!

Let There Be Peace On Earth
Cunt-Twat
No real… its cool to wear childrens Band-Aids.
I'm not a Cockblocker, I'm a COCKSUCKER!
posted on 02-21-2002 @ 4:34 PM      
O&A Board Regular
Registered: Jan. 01
this is for daniel pearl.

==============================================
:) WHO SAID I DON'T LOVE THE SLACKJAW?!? :)


Page 1 2 3
Displaying 51-63 of 63 messages in this thread.