YourMomsBox!
I'm confused. Silera encourages it, others delete it.... - Printable Version

+- YourMomsBox! (https://www.cdih.net/ymb)
+-- Forum: Other Stuff (https://www.cdih.net/ymb/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Silera's Box (https://www.cdih.net/ymb/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+--- Thread: I'm confused. Silera encourages it, others delete it.... (/showthread.php?tid=495)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14


I\'m confused. Silera encourages it, others delete it.... - 60FeetUnderWater - 05-28-2003

Quote:Originally posted by GreasyItalianPrincess
Quote:Originally posted by tinymike
Quote:Originally posted by fhore twentee

HAHAHAHAAHAHAHA!!!

you care about \"style\"?!

you trendy fuck. Rolleyes

you fucked GIP?

and yet you call me a queen.....pffftttt....

he tried, but got zonked and fell asleep.


I fucked corpses that, despite their rigor mortis, possessed more vigor .


trendy and boring - not a way to my heart, I'll tell you that much.


I\'m confused. Silera encourages it, others delete it.... - Ronin - 05-28-2003

Quote:Originally posted by tinymike
Quote:Originally posted by KensPen
tiny mike, continues to lower the bar on teh funney........

let the limbo music play.

shut up bitch! You wouldn't know a funny if it bit you in the ass and introduced itself. Pathetic whining? yes. that seems to be your specialty, funnys? NO.

Where did funny bite you in the ass? Did you get a rabies shot?


I\'m confused. Silera encourages it, others delete it.... - tinymike - 05-28-2003

Quote:Originally posted by Ronin

Where did funny bite you in the ass? Did you get a rabies shot?

hmmmm.....uhhh....funny bit me in the ass......isn't it obvious? not the smartest bulb in the batch...are ya now?

And yes, I did get a rabies shot for it, among others.


I\'m confused. Silera encourages it, others delete it.... - Buttmunch - 05-28-2003

I'm going to delete this thread.


I\'m confused. Silera encourages it, others delete it.... - KensPen - 05-28-2003

Quote:not the smartest bulb in the batch

how can you delete a threat that is chock full of such wittisisms.


I\'m confused. Silera encourages it, others delete it.... - tinymike - 05-28-2003

Quote:Originally posted by Buttmunch
I'm going to delete this thread.

Great....another mod on a power trip. don't you have anything better to do?


I\'m confused. Silera encourages it, others delete it.... - GreasyItalianPrincess - 05-28-2003

Quote:Originally posted by fhore twentee
Quote:Originally posted by GreasyItalianPrincess
Quote:Originally posted by tinymike
Quote:Originally posted by fhore twentee

HAHAHAHAAHAHAHA!!!

you care about \"style\"?!

you trendy fuck. Rolleyes

you fucked GIP?

and yet you call me a queen.....pffftttt....

he tried, but got zonked and fell asleep.


I fucked corpses that, despite their rigor mortis, possessed more vigor .


trendy and boring - not a way to my heart, I'll tell you that much.


A. Automated Reasoning (AR)

The standard will be suitable for automated logical inference to support knowledge-based reasoning applications.

B. Inter-Operability (IO)

The standard will provide a basis for achieving Inter-Operability among various software and database applications.

[AB]

Given a quantitative setup like (X, X -> A), for example,
where X = R^k and A = R, let us imagine that one of the
functions f : X -> A measures some intensive amplitude
or quality of the points of X that we will call the
"verve" of x in X. In other words, verve : X -> A.

Now we come to one of those conventions of interpretation that everybody
normally understands so well, and so intuitively, that nobody ever finds
much need to discuss it in explicit or systematic terms; thus, in order
for me to do so now, I will be forced to indulge in a bit of neologism.
Let me then coin the term "nomination" of f, written "nom(f)", to refer
to the whole collection of syntactic expressions that we use in a given
context to refer to a given function f : X -> A.

For example, if f = verve : X -> A, suppose
that we have a formula for verve that says:

verve = ((vigor)(tenon)/(rigor)) - mortis.

Then the syntactic expression "((vigor)(tenon)/(rigor)) - mortis" is
one more piece of string that we can collect in the nomination of f.

So far, here is the picture that I have in mind:

| nom(f) = {"f", "verve", "((vigor)(tenon)/(rigor)) - mortis", ...}
| |
| |
| |
| X ---@ A

Notice the different characters of the various syntactic elements in nom(f).
Some of them, like "f", may be "dummy indexical transients" (DIT's), signs
that are not really distinctive of the particular function being discussed,
except for a passing moment and the extent of local or transitory contexts.
Others may be tokens that can be traded on to denominate the function, but
only in a given community, dialect, language, or region. What it takes to
achieve a "language independent terminology" (LIT), that is, expressions
that enjoy a wide range of translatability, may be a difficult question.


I\'m confused. Silera encourages it, others delete it.... - tinymike - 05-28-2003

ken - here. I think you might need this.

[Image: dictionary.jpg]


I\'m confused. Silera encourages it, others delete it.... - IrishAlkey - 05-28-2003

Now we're having fun!


I\'m confused. Silera encourages it, others delete it.... - Buttmunch - 05-28-2003

I still think I'm going to delete this.