Wrong.
The team in the 10-team league is better because there are 2 (potentially) stud RB's
or
The team in the 12-team league is better because there is more all-around balance vs. better RB performance.
mine thus far....
QB Daunte Culpepper
RB Willis McGahee
RB Domanick Davis
WR Joe Horn
WR Michael Clayton
WR Jerry Porter
TE Alge Crumpler
WR backup Isaac Bruce
QB backup Michael Vick
Patriots Defense
next is kicker and backup RB, then some depth
my team, 10 team league, tight ends count as recievers and you have to take 2 qbs, 4 rbs, 6 wrs, 2 kickers and 2 defense. i don't really like my team
qb - bulger, carr
rb - mcgahee, martin, foster, bennett
wr - r moss, jimmy smith, kennison, stokley, troy williamson, mccardell
k - vinatieri, peterson
defense - balitomore, jacksonville
10 team leagues are for wimps
the fact that it's a 10-team league is negated by the fact you need 2x as many active players
and tight ends counting as receivers makes it a lot easier. gonzales and gates are basically #2s, guys like crumpler, heap and witten are 3s...and nobody is stuck with losers like chris cooley or teyo johnson
TEs are feast or famine, even the gates and gonzos.
Galt Wrote:the fact that it's a 10-team league is negated by the fact you need 2x as many active players
you don't actually start all of them, you just need to have those spots filled on your roster. starting is the same as every league, except for that tight end rule - 1 qb, 2 rb, 3 wr, 1k, 1d