CDIH

Gooch Wrote:anal rape is ok if it's between friends.

poor henry hill

Mad Wrote:Beautiful people, like myself have to deal with people that sometimes just won't take no for an answer.

STOP CALLING ME ANTHONY, I DON'T WANT TO FUCK YOU.

Is that clear enough?

not even in your wildest gay militia fantasies.

You wish.

not if you were the last kook on the plantation.

Good thing, because I have rules about fucking inferior species, Mr. Three-fifths.

you're not of pure aryan blood, your own brethren would disown you.

Keyser Soze Wrote:Well, so much for a serious political discussion. The kook and the left wing apologist have decided instead of debating issues they'll just play out their sterotypes. How refreshing.

This officially knocked me off the fence and onto team keyser.

Ken sucks!

Considering 'Aryans' are:

Quote:Ar·y·an Pronunciation Key (âr-n, r-)
n.

1. Indo-Iranian. No longer in technical use.
2. A member of the people who spoke the parent language of the Indo-European languages. No longer in technical use.
3. A member of any people speaking an Indo-European language. No longer in technical use.
4. In Nazism and neo-Nazism, a non-Jewish Caucasian, especially one of Nordic type, supposed to be part of a master race.

They're more of the first part, then any of the fourth, you are correct.

which one of you is the sidekick?

we're like butch cassidy and the sundance kid.

In all seriousness - he is right.

I am as guilty of extremism in favor of bush as you are against him.
The difference is, I know Bush isn't always right. I do have problems with some of his policies.

You on the other hand would villanize him if he stopped today and ran the country as you wished.
You are one of many who are engulfed in the party debate, not the true betterment of the country.

As far as debating each other, it always regresses into you hating bush and me defending him.

One extremist reaction incites the other and it goes on and on and on. The senate is laughable and 90% of their time is wasted on partisan issues. We all know that, yet pretend not to notice we do the same fucking thing.

I'm more of a Lone Gunman, then a follower.

Hoon Wrote:In all seriousness - he is right.

I am as guilty of extremism in favor of bush as you are against him.
The difference is, I know Bush isn't always right. I do have problems with some of his policies.

You on the other hand would villanize him if he stopped today and ran the country as you wished.
You are one of many who are engulfed in the party debate, not the true betterment of the country.

As far as debating each other, it always regresses into you hating bush and me defending him.

One extremist reaction incites the other and it goes on and on and on. The senate is laughable and 90% of their time is wasted on partisan issues. We all know that, yet pretend not to notice we do the same fucking thing.

i'd vote for hoon.

Mad Wrote:I'm more of a Lone Gunman, then a follower.

.... and tookie williams was redeemed.

Hoon.....
in reality, I blast Bush for something he has done wrong, and then you defend him....

I don't blast Bush for everything... in fact name one instance where I have blasted Bush and been proven wrong.

the folly of our debates is your knee jerk reaction of defending him in the face of overwhelming evidence.

Ken'sPen Wrote:Hoon.....
in reality, I blast Bush for something he has done wrong, and then you defend him....

I don't blast Bush for everything... in fact name one instance where I have blasted Bush and been proven wrong.

the folly of our debates is your knee jerk reaction of defending him in the face of overwhelming evidence.

Do you remember the whole Taliban aide debate from the doors board to which I left you no other option than to apologize, for which you did?

I could go quote it if you'd like.

bush is wrong on immigration, creates a poor public image of America in the mindset of the world even though he has good intentions of trying to protect us from 'evil'. i dont question his motives, i question his methods. although his ties to saudi oil makes his motives somewhat questionable, i'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt.

you mean the fact that we were giving aid to the Taliban prior to 9-11 and Bush's condemnation of them as evil....
and I was under the impression that it was money and food? and you pointed out that it was just food,
and I google searched it, and found out that you were right, and acknowledged my error? THAT is the feather in your cap?

When I was wrong I hope you noticed how promptly I admitted it.......
do you care to admit any of your errors along the way?

Keyser Soze Wrote:bush is wrong on immigration, creates a poor public image of America in the mindset of the world even though he has good intentions of trying to protect us from 'evil'. i dont question his motives, i question his methods. although his ties to saudi oil makes his motives somewhat questionable, i'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt.

This could be something I wrote... except I'd have several typo's.

Hoon Wrote:

Mad Wrote:I'm more of a Lone Gunman, then a follower.

.... and tookie williams was redeemed.

Big difference, I'm white and have never MURDERED anyone and have nothing to do with criminal activity, fuckass.