if i remember correctly, he wasnt driving.
i pictured it like in adaptation
I haven't seen magnolia yet but it's a really pathetic way to go, loser face.
I heard magnolia was really really bad.
whoops, sorry i meant adaption
Magnolia wasn't bad. A few of the story lines weren't that great (Thomas C Reilly's and William Macy's were especially lame), but Tom Cruise's was awesome, the little kids in the TV show were funny, and the frog thing was done well. It was also interesting how it wasn't like Pulp Fiction with 4 different stories, but all the different vignettes tie into one story.
But the movie was over 3 hours long and could have been cut down by at least 30 minutes just by taking out or shortening 50 unnecessary 30-second zoom ins for nearly every shot. The song they all sang was a dumb.
I own it. 2 1/2 stars
I saw your dvdspot page and was touched.
where is galts dvd spot page?
seriously, come on.
I am about 90 dvds away from cracking the top 100 collections.
You should totally spend the $1,800 to make that happen.
Or you could just lie!
Only an unprincipled infidel would lie about their dvd collection
magnolia was awful. when it was over i really wished for those hours that i lost back.
do any of you remember if opie & anthony went to woodstock 99? i remember walking around & there were these 2 dj's standing on top of a van doing their show & they were interviewing a chick who was topless, but had a lobster painted on her torso & the crowd around them was going wild.
for the life of me i can't remember what the dj's looked like, & i didn't know what o&a looked like back then.
Once you've seen anthony I doubt you could ever forget that face.
handsome like a fresh corpse
Galt Wrote:Magnolia wasn't bad. A few of the story lines weren't that great (Thomas C Reilly's and William Macy's were especially lame), but Tom Cruise's was awesome, the little kids in the TV show were funny, and the frog thing was done well. It was also interesting how it wasn't like Pulp Fiction with 4 different stories, but all the different vignettes tie into one story.
But the movie was over 3 hours long and could have been cut down by at least 30 minutes just by taking out or shortening 50 unnecessary 30-second zoom ins for nearly every shot. The song they all sang was a dumb.
I own it. 2 1/2 stars
This is the only the third movie which has earned Tom Cruise an Academy Award nomination, and it was his first Supporting Actor nomination.
I own this dvd, and I think it's a good movie. Not great, good. I liked the John C Reily storyline, only in terms of the coked out chick he was trying to get in the pants of. I thought Tom Cruise was awesome in this, and it helps that he's not the lead character, but also you can't really have a lead when you have 10 different point of views in one movie.
![[Image: 20041209anthonylohan.jpg]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/Goatweed/20041209anthonylohan.jpg)
![[Image: hanks.gif]](http://www.columbia.edu/cu/lweb/eresources/exhibitions/sw25/gifs/hanks.gif)