07-30-2002, 06:10 PM
Maynard, in science the burden of proof lies on the person that claims something exists.
So if you said there is a heaven/hell, the burden of proof lies on you. The burden of proof doesn't lie on kid who says that there is no such thing. Especially since you technically can't prove a negative.
And that ladies and gentlemen was the cdih scientific post of the day. Tune in 2 months from now when another member has an actual coherent thought.
So if you said there is a heaven/hell, the burden of proof lies on you. The burden of proof doesn't lie on kid who says that there is no such thing. Especially since you technically can't prove a negative.
And that ladies and gentlemen was the cdih scientific post of the day. Tune in 2 months from now when another member has an actual coherent thought.
<center>![[Image: planecrash.jpg]](http://pinkorag.homestead.com/files/planecrash.jpg)
</center>
</center>