Is Saddam - Hitler in munich allover again?

[fbd]

we have to take the chance that he'll never use the weapons, because by your logic, we should then take out india, pakistan, england, germany, france, japan, china and the rest of the major powers with nuclear weapons. hitler should have been stopped after his failed coup at the beer hall pustch, but instead he was jailed for a year or something and wrote "my struggle"(i'll butcher the german name). but even when you ignore that, there were plenty of times when he should have been stopped but nobody tried, and with saddam, that has only happened once, and we took back what he did. hitler annexes austria, europe doesnt care. demands the sudetenland, gets it. he makes an alliance with slovakia, they become a satillite. all this time, easter europe was being eaten and england let it happen. but all saddam has done was stockpile weapons and invade kuwait. he invaded, we pushed him back. thats it, unlike hitler, we stopped him. he's trying more, but he hasnt done anything since, so why attack him? it is unjustified.