05-05-2003, 04:08 AM
Can this war really be considered valid, worthy and a victory if there are no weapons found? I am getting pretty sick of the republicans saying "well even if there are no weapons, we still did a good thing."
The point was that saddam was a threat cause he was conceiving a mass arsenal of epic proportions that threatened the free world. Yes ousting him was a good thing but not with such a weak economy. The whole point was that the war was based on these weapons, yet there are none. There were none used and none found.
They had survelaince photos so they found them somehow before, where are they now? To say that he destroyed them all is ridiculous, they made it seem like he had an incredible amount just festering, how could he destroy all that in a few weeks without anyone noticing?
The point was that saddam was a threat cause he was conceiving a mass arsenal of epic proportions that threatened the free world. Yes ousting him was a good thing but not with such a weak economy. The whole point was that the war was based on these weapons, yet there are none. There were none used and none found.
They had survelaince photos so they found them somehow before, where are they now? To say that he destroyed them all is ridiculous, they made it seem like he had an incredible amount just festering, how could he destroy all that in a few weeks without anyone noticing?
![[Image: BT-vivalaevolucion-gallery-2756.jpg]](http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i242/gonzostyle/BT-vivalaevolucion-gallery-2756.jpg)
http://www.dvdspot.com/member=Gonzostyle
http://www.myspace.com/brooklyngonzo
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770777388
diceisgod Wrote:I LOVE YOU GONZY WONZY SNOOKIE WOOKIE DUMPLIN BUNS!