03-27-2004, 07:19 AM
I believe Clarke for one simple reason. I believe him because I view him as a woman just out of a relationship. You know the scenario while she was with her man she liked him a lot so she would console him that "it's a good size" and "it happens to a lot of guys"
The second she's liberated she can finally get it all off her chest and tell him that he indeed has a abnormally small dick and that it really doesn't happen to a lot of guys Mr. Quickie McCumstoofast.
In the end between Bush & Kerry, i'd have to choose Bush. Kerry is too allover the place on his stances, plus he's for major tax increases and gas increases. Kerry is also very shoddy on issues of national security and is more concerned about being liked by the french. I'd rather have neither but in this case bush is more stable (sad but true) than Kerry. You can't blame bush for 9/11 cause even if we did invade afghanistan and killed bin laden 9/11 woulda happened either way, it wouldnt have been called off due to Usama's death. Clinton dropped the ball but think of it this way, if he went for a large scale invasion to take down al qaeda people would have yelled "Wag the dog" and he'd have been under the microscope like Bush is over Iraq, it unfortunatly took 9/11 to make it happen. People don't take notice until it's on TV, just like they didn't make an uproar over somalia till they saw the soldiers dragged through the streets on TV, as if they thought people played monopoly over a cup of tea during war.
The second she's liberated she can finally get it all off her chest and tell him that he indeed has a abnormally small dick and that it really doesn't happen to a lot of guys Mr. Quickie McCumstoofast.
In the end between Bush & Kerry, i'd have to choose Bush. Kerry is too allover the place on his stances, plus he's for major tax increases and gas increases. Kerry is also very shoddy on issues of national security and is more concerned about being liked by the french. I'd rather have neither but in this case bush is more stable (sad but true) than Kerry. You can't blame bush for 9/11 cause even if we did invade afghanistan and killed bin laden 9/11 woulda happened either way, it wouldnt have been called off due to Usama's death. Clinton dropped the ball but think of it this way, if he went for a large scale invasion to take down al qaeda people would have yelled "Wag the dog" and he'd have been under the microscope like Bush is over Iraq, it unfortunatly took 9/11 to make it happen. People don't take notice until it's on TV, just like they didn't make an uproar over somalia till they saw the soldiers dragged through the streets on TV, as if they thought people played monopoly over a cup of tea during war.
![[Image: BT-vivalaevolucion-gallery-2756.jpg]](http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i242/gonzostyle/BT-vivalaevolucion-gallery-2756.jpg)
http://www.dvdspot.com/member=Gonzostyle
http://www.myspace.com/brooklyngonzo
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770777388
diceisgod Wrote:I LOVE YOU GONZY WONZY SNOOKIE WOOKIE DUMPLIN BUNS!