04-13-2004, 01:26 AM
how can one have an intelligent debate when the core of the discussion is a study that might not even exist.
You understand that you are questioned when you have previously made shit up.
If you feel you are being unfairly attacked, then it's quite simple to prevent it in the future. When you are questioned for evidence of facts (this and the stock bullshit) simply provide them.
Nobody has had a problem doing so in the past except you.
You understand that you are questioned when you have previously made shit up.
If you feel you are being unfairly attacked, then it's quite simple to prevent it in the future. When you are questioned for evidence of facts (this and the stock bullshit) simply provide them.
Nobody has had a problem doing so in the past except you.