06-12-2004, 09:13 PM
This just baffling. This is the exact same thing as what happened with the Toronto Hottie argument about common law in Canada.
It's like trying to reason with a door. How can you cling to the hope that my statistics are "false". They are from the CDC. They are from the US Government. If those numbers aren't true, then what could possibly be?
It is a fact. It is black and white. Either the government spent that money, or they did not. There is no gray area. If they spent the money, doubled every single year for a decade, how could one possibly say that they "ignored" the problem.
How can you possibly just willfully ignore statistics that disprove your baseless opinion?
It's like trying to reason with a door. How can you cling to the hope that my statistics are "false". They are from the CDC. They are from the US Government. If those numbers aren't true, then what could possibly be?
It is a fact. It is black and white. Either the government spent that money, or they did not. There is no gray area. If they spent the money, doubled every single year for a decade, how could one possibly say that they "ignored" the problem.
How can you possibly just willfully ignore statistics that disprove your baseless opinion?