02-15-2006, 05:40 PM
in other words....
let's change the entire topic of this thread in an attempt to put me on the defensive?
I'll be happy to discuss this....only after we continue to look at the corruption with the Republican's in power... which is what this thread is about.
Short answer though. Saddam was not a threat to us,
and should have been a low priority.
1. Bin Laden
2. Radical Wahabi islam (which is from SAUDI ARABIA)
3. North Korea and Iran going nuclear.
those should have been the priorities in any response to Terrorism.
let's change the entire topic of this thread in an attempt to put me on the defensive?
I'll be happy to discuss this....only after we continue to look at the corruption with the Republican's in power... which is what this thread is about.
Short answer though. Saddam was not a threat to us,
and should have been a low priority.
1. Bin Laden
2. Radical Wahabi islam (which is from SAUDI ARABIA)
3. North Korea and Iran going nuclear.
those should have been the priorities in any response to Terrorism.
![[Image: KENSIG1.jpg]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/0903/drusilla/KENSIG1.jpg)