10-16-2006, 04:31 PM
especially two year olds doesn't need to be in the bylaws. no bylaws can be picture perfect. shit, our country's court system requires disgression from officials.
and he wasn't instantly banned. he was repeatedly warned and in no certain terms explained how he really didn't give a shit about being banned. so, his wish was granted.
as for fighting when the opponent isn't around...
i came here when asked, didn't i? and i find it mildly amusing you're too frightened to address the baker rule point i made.
note:
i again would like to point out this isn't the type of disagreement where zingers win the debate. it's simply a difference in opinion. hence, the "awful innards" of this thread.
and he wasn't instantly banned. he was repeatedly warned and in no certain terms explained how he really didn't give a shit about being banned. so, his wish was granted.
as for fighting when the opponent isn't around...
i came here when asked, didn't i? and i find it mildly amusing you're too frightened to address the baker rule point i made.
note:
i again would like to point out this isn't the type of disagreement where zingers win the debate. it's simply a difference in opinion. hence, the "awful innards" of this thread.