03-19-2003, 04:38 PM
I beleive that Saddam should not have to disarm. We've left many a ruler in charge who have been much more hellbent on killing their own people. The only reason this one is not allowed is that we don't like past supporters to not follow our directions, and b/c of the high oil content of the region that hangs in the balance. This war is been thrown down our throats in the most insulting fashion. They are doing what the UN "failed to do". No, actually, we did not like that we did not have the vote swing our way and we are cowboying it. And, I don't really care if we turn Iraq to dust. My main problem is ruining the NATO alliance over oil. It is more important to have a unified front during terroristic times than some ridiculous side-war to Iraq.
We had the world unified behind us on our war on terrorism. Yet we left that at the alter, and then found a mistress, and somehow we are outraged that nobody likes this "new" old flame. Bad administration planning and policy.
Edited By Gooch on 1048092037
We had the world unified behind us on our war on terrorism. Yet we left that at the alter, and then found a mistress, and somehow we are outraged that nobody likes this "new" old flame. Bad administration planning and policy.
Edited By Gooch on 1048092037
There are four kinds of people in this world: cretins, fools, morons, and lunatics.
![[Image: goochserious.jpg]](http://www.boredplanet.com/img/goochserious.jpg)
Enter Text to validate the ridiculous amount of time you spend online here. </center>
![[Image: goochserious.jpg]](http://www.boredplanet.com/img/goochserious.jpg)
Enter Text to validate the ridiculous amount of time you spend online here. </center>