Arpi's man junk sig - should it stay or should he lose it

[Sean Cold]

Never EEEEEver say I don't give you a chance to let your voices be heard.

So, how about it?

[Rape Fantasizer]

i think its sexy

[Sean Cold]

i think its sexy

Again, I figured as much.

I knew I should have checked if you were logged in before I put this thread up! :bouncer:

[crx girl]

i could live without it, but it doesn't bother me all that much.

[Rape Fantasizer]

i think its sexy

Again, I figured as much.

I knew I should have checked if you were logged in before I put this thread up! :bouncer:

LOL, I wasn;t but I could just tell that I needed to come and look at something.

[Ants in My Pants]

I think it makes a bold statement about the man's sexuality. I say let him keep it.

[The Sleeper]

I think it makes a bold statement about the man's sexuality. I say let him keep it.

That's fuckin funny.

Though I think his little girl sig is much better spank material, no?

[DGW]

We all know Arpi's a faegget, but do we all have to deal with his infatuation with manjunk? I'd like to see it go.

[Doc]

but do we all have to deal with his infatuation with manjunk?

I thought he used that sig because there are some deep-seated issues he has to resolve about a hippity-hop, but you're probably right

[av8er]

There are colon cowboys running all over this place, getting rid of a picture of man junk isn't gonna make it any less gay.

I say let him keep it if it makes hm happy.

[Kid A]

I don't understand how that is not pornography, and thusly it should be removed.

Also, I cram to understand why anyone would want to have that as a sig pic. Is it for shock value? Do you enjoy looking at deformed man junk every time you post? Or, is it the fact that you love to cause an uproar and the attention we are giving you is exactly what you craved in the first place? Hmmmmmmm?

I think it is the latter of the three.

[AdolescentMasturbator]

I think he should stop stop taking pictures of himself and posting it in the board.

[av8er]

I don't understand how that is not pornography

It's not a sexual picture in nature, it was taken from medical archives I believe. Thus then, it is not pornography.

[Kid A]

I don't understand how that is not pornography

It's not a sexual picture in nature, it was taken from medical archives I believe. Thus then, it is not pornography.

It's deformed man-junk. Why in the hell are you defending it?

[Sean Cold]

It's deformed man-junk. Why in the hell are you defending it?

Read his marquee, it explains more than we would ever want or need to know about fly boy at this point.

it is truely just a disturbing thing :puke:

[Kid A]

I would love to read his marquee. However, I have signatures and avatars turned off (a lovely feature of this board), because I am at work and my co-workers certainly do not appreciate any form of humor involving the inflamed testes of a man. Thanks though.

[Grumpy]

Two things disturbing about his pics

A. The fact that he it has deformed junk in it is enough to send shivers down my spine. What is his fascination with oversized balls? More to play with for him?

2. How odd is it that he knows where to find those pics? Ya think he has the link in his favorites?

Dump the junk pics or I'm bring back the midget with the weights tied to his junk (uncensored).

[DGW]

Dump the junk pics or I'm bring back the midget with the weights tied to his junk (uncensored).

It's total anarchy!

[Sean Cold]

It's total anarchy!

Dude, don't encourage him. I said I don't mind have dicks on the site, not pictures of dick.

[Sluggo]

There are colon cowboys running all over this place

Where's Kid's Pot/Kettle pic when we need it?