Displaying 1-21 of 21 messages in this thread. |
Posted By | Discussion Topic: Raw or Smackdown? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
WNEWs GIRL i don't have a mule but i have a cock Intercontinental Intergender Thumb Wrestling Champion CUNT ROCKETTE The new "third". AmyMohrBuddy One line in my sig is absolutely fucking disgusting, see if you can find it. | posted on 03-22-2002 @ 12:33 AM | ||||
O&A Board Veteran Registered: Aug. 00 | if you were in the business and you had a choice which show you went to, where would you go, raw or smackdown? id go to raw because i looooove a live show, plus i love ric flair woooooooooooooo ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I LOVE THE SLASH & THE CRACK HITLER & THE REE FROSTY IS MY HERO & I LOVE MY BABY'S DADDY, AUSTIN | ||||
Jack Meehoff Teh funny blah blah absent blah blah teh blah | posted on 03-22-2002 @ 12:37 AM | ||||
Psychopath Registered: Jan. 02 | Raw. Just because it is has been around longer and has a more established viewer base. | ||||
rageparty 123...Not so bare anymore since I got a number underneath my name again I also have an imaginary girlfriend. | posted on 03-22-2002 @ 12:42 AM | ||||
O&A Board Regular Registered: Aug. 01 | Raw for sure, love the intro better, the pyro ;)Raw is always huge after a PPV, SmackDown ahs nothing. Bringing in SmackDown was a mistake anyway, the WWF should have stuck with one, or two if you count Heat, program on TV per week. Raw is way better. | ||||
Cluster F | posted on 03-22-2002 @ 12:44 AM | ||||
O&A Board Regular Registered: Oct. 00 | RAW, because its on monday nights, where wrestling should be. Id rather work for Vince though. Go Knicks, Giants, Rangers, and the 2002 World Champs: New York Mets Long Live Psycho Bitch | ||||
HyBriD FN Moron is an indian giver!! I had my cool status for about 10 min. then it was gone. GONE! G.O.O.F.B.A.H.G.S. Agent WD40 Licensed to Kill My spoon is TOO BIG. (finally) Hanger-on to the JYDs for LIFE I INVENTED ORANGE MOTHERFUCKER This status is sponsored by: P®oJë©T M@¥hέm | posted on 03-22-2002 @ 12:49 AM | ||||
O&A Board Regular Registered: Sep. 01 | raw. i dont want to be on any show that the rock named. | ||||
Sir Okonkwo | posted on 03-22-2002 @ 1:04 AM | ||||
Psychopath Registered: Jun. 01 | WWF Metal. FTL is not to blame for this abomination of a sig pic. | ||||
DonWest | posted on 03-22-2002 @ 1:09 AM | ||||
Psychopath Registered: Feb. 01 | I would choose Raw without even thinking about it...Also have to remember being that Raw is on cable you can get away with alittle more than being on broadcast TV on UPN. | ||||
Subzero316 TERRORIST voted most likely to get searched at the airport Subama Bin Zero (© AntsInMyPants - 2002) Seriously need to rethink my concept of "funny" Alkey is my bitch! I'm havening a hard time fittening in. It's official, I am seriously a complete and utter ass-tool, please anally rape me with a rusty 5 iron wraped in barbed wire. I am the new Balloon Not. Be careful around me ladies, I don't use common sense. | posted on 03-22-2002 @ 1:36 AM | ||||
O&A Board Regular Registered: Oct. 00 | Raw for sure,i been watching Raw since it was on the USA network. What? - Stone Cold Steve Austin | ||||
JackDan1974 | posted on 03-22-2002 @ 9:22 AM | ||||
O&A Board Regular Registered: Jul. 01 | I don't know which I would choose, all I know is that I miss the Nitro girls...:( YAHOO Sucks ass becasue none of my Sig Pic's are working | ||||
Hello! Hello! Diamond Dust! Hello! | posted on 03-22-2002 @ 9:46 AM | ||||
Psychopath Registered: Feb. 01 | Smackdown because ratings show more people watch Smackdown than Raw and I am a prima donna who knows that the entire world needs to see me in all my glory. If the ratings were even, though, I'd pick Raw just because of the history value of the show being much bigger than for Smackdown. | ||||
hornygoatweed I've Got A Vagina With Teeth. G.O.O.F.B.A.H.G.S. Dragoon Battalion My friends call me Weed | posted on 03-22-2002 @ 9:52 AM | ||||
O&A Board Regular Registered: Jan. 01 | quote:Screw that - I'd wanna be on Jakked!!! quote:I don't know if that's true but if it is, maybe that's ebcause RAW is on a cable channel and not everyone in the country has cable (hard to believe, but it's possible). Seriously, I'd wanna go on RAW. Smackdown! sucks because it's taped and the results are usually posted on the net the night of the taping, if not the following morning. If the show sounds like it's gonna suck, people won't tune in (like myself). If Smackdown! went live I'd still go to RAW only because cable allows for a little more in the way of censorship, not to mentoon RAW is always 10 to 15 minutes longer than it should be (why they just don't make the show 2 1/2 or 3 hours long at this point is beyond me). You can reach me through AIM or email. Feel free to contact me if you have any board questions, techie (PC) questions, or even if you just wanna chat.
| ||||
skitchr4u G.O.O.F.B.A.H.G.S. Xtreme Skiing Assualt Force | posted on 03-22-2002 @ 9:52 AM | ||||
O&A Board Regular Registered: Dec. 00 | quote: um, no. it is shown that more people watch smackdown in the ratings numbers, therefore this arguement holds no weight. I would rather be on the Ric Flair show because I would be a worker and not some talking baby like the crock or chump hogan | ||||
iampoop | posted on 03-22-2002 @ 1:17 PM | ||||
Hanger-On Registered: Jan. 02 | quote: i would say more people have cable or a dish than people that get STUPID UPN i know several people that have dish's that don't get UPN. by the way i want Vince to somehow get Raw cus it is the much more exciting show SPINNING COMPLACENTLY IN THE DARKNESS,COVERED AND BLINDED BY A BLANKET OF LITTLE LIVES,FALSE SECURITY HAS LULLED THE MADNESS OF THIS WORLD INTO A SLUMBER. WAKE UP!!! AN EYE IS UPON YOU, STARING STRAIGHT DOWN AND KEENLY THROUGH, SEEING ALL THAT YOU ARE AND EVERYTHING YOU CAN NEVER BE. YES, AN EYE IS UPON YOU, AN EYE READY TO BLINK. SO FACE FORWARD, WITH ARMS WIDE OPEN AND MIND REELING. YOUR FUTURE HAS ARRIVED... ARE YOU READY TO GO ? J.P Saticoy (1947) | ||||
TeenWeek what's a status? | posted on 03-22-2002 @ 1:27 PM | ||||
O&A Board Regular Registered: Oct. 00 | From what I read in a rumor, the wrestlers will be jumping ship or showing up on each show pretty often. | ||||
Jack Meehoff Teh funny blah blah absent blah blah teh blah | posted on 03-22-2002 @ 2:00 PM | ||||
Psychopath Registered: Jan. 02 | quote: Uhm.. could someone please explain the ratings thing to me? When I read about the ratings, Raw will do like a 4.7 while Smackdown does like a 3.9 or something along those lines. Raw is almost always higher and that is why I thought it had a bigger viewer base. | ||||
WWFallon | posted on 03-22-2002 @ 7:42 PM | ||||
Hanger-On Registered: Jun. 01 | I've been to a bunch of both shows and RAW is much better. Smackdown! has too many long breaks in between matches. | ||||
WWFallon | posted on 03-22-2002 @ 7:42 PM | ||||
Hanger-On Registered: Jun. 01 | I think cable ratings and broadcast tv ratings have different scales. This message was edited by WWFallon on 3-22-02 @ 7:46 PM | ||||
WWFallon | posted on 03-22-2002 @ 7:42 PM | ||||
Hanger-On Registered: Jun. 01 | Double post, sorry. This message was edited by WWFallon on 3-22-02 @ 7:46 PM | ||||
Hello! Hello! Diamond Dust! Hello! | posted on 03-22-2002 @ 9:03 PM | ||||
Psychopath Registered: Feb. 01 | quote: quote: That is true. A rating is the percentage of people who have ACCESS to that form of braodcasting (cable or free TV) who watched. A share is what percentage of those who have access to the channel who were watching TV at the time watched, but we're not going to get into that. So, as a result of cable having less possible viewers than free TV, less people can watch Raw and it will still get a higher rating number than Smackdown, but not a higher amount of people watching. For example, let's say you have 10% of 20 and also have 5% of 100. 10% of 20 is 2. 5% of 100 is 5. The 10% is a higher percentage, but the 5% yields a higher number, which is the real thing we are concerned about here. From what I know off the top of my head, a 3.9 rating in free TV on UPN is equivalent to about a 4.8 rating or so on TNN or a cable network. So, Smackdown usually beats Raw in cable ratings language by 4.8 to 4.6. It is not a dramatic beating, but I have found that just about every week, Smackdown beats Raw consistently. I guess MICHAEL COLE=RATINGS!!!!! As for this week, if you are interested, ratings were higher than the past few weeks and Raw did it's best number since August at a 5.3 while Smackdown scored highly with a 4.3, meaning it was just about equal this week with Raw maybe slightly edging Smackdown out for once! Of course, the night-after-Wrestlemania edition of Raw would be expected to do that, so I'd imagine this was expected to be an odd week anyway. | ||||
OA.com's Bodyguard Anger problem? What anger problem? I hate the fucking mud! USA | posted on 03-23-2002 @ 1:26 PM | ||||
O&A Board Regular Registered: Jan. 01 | I'd go to RAW mainly because that is their main show and there are better chances of surprises happening there. Nothing big really happens on Smackdown due to the fact that it is taped and the secret would be out the next day on the Internet. GonzoStyle | ||||
HyBriD FN Moron is an indian giver!! I had my cool status for about 10 min. then it was gone. GONE! G.O.O.F.B.A.H.G.S. Agent WD40 Licensed to Kill My spoon is TOO BIG. (finally) Hanger-on to the JYDs for LIFE I INVENTED ORANGE MOTHERFUCKER This status is sponsored by: P®oJë©T M@¥hέm | posted on 03-23-2002 @ 1:51 PM | ||||
O&A Board Regular Registered: Sep. 01 | quote: what about the AMAZING come back of x-pac? that was on smackdown......... ;) This message was edited by HyBriD on 3-23-02 @ 1:52 PM | ||||
Displaying 1-21 of 21 messages in this thread. |