YourMomsBox!

After seeing today's front cover of Paltrow's kid I decided to write a letter to the Post.

I doubt they will print it but I thought I'd share it here:

Dear to whom it may concern,

Your Gwenyth Paltrow cover article on Monday, May 17th is a disgrace. This recent plethora of celebrity worship on both your part and other newspapers in the NY area is simply atrocious. William Randolph Hearst is rolling in his grave. There is no excuse for this blatant disregard of the intelligence of your readers. It's becoming increasingly harder to distinguish between your paper and the National Enquirer.

With all the turmoil that is going on at the global scale and a national election only six months away one would assume that there is more important issues at hand than some Hollywood actress propagating. I foresee a spot on the supermarket discount rack in the future for the NY Post if you continue to cater to simpletons.

Yours,
TheDude

what? No reference to a racial or social stereotype? You're losing your touch dude.

*let the record state that I agree with you 100%. who gives a shit.

What exactly was the article about?

The front page of the Post featured, along with a large full color photo, the birth of Paltrow's new daughter named Apple.

Apple?

You could have ended it with, "What the fuck kind of stupid name for a kid is Apple anyway????"

there are way too many p's and l's going on in that name.

Apple Paltrow?

Apple Lonia Paltrow?

Quote:Originally posted by TheDude
The front page of the Post featured, along with a large full color photo, the birth of Paltrow's new daughter named Apple.

That's it? Did it at least look like Mike Myers from Paltrow's movie A View From The Top?






If so, then I could understand it being a front page story.