Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sex With Sam
#2
Quote:Originally posted by ResidualBitterness
As long as the FCC keeps talking about increasing fines and stopping indecency (they're picking on the Sopranos now)
How can the FCC go after a strictly pay cable program? (And by "strictly pay cable", I mean that the programming is funded solely by subscribers, with no advertisment revenue). The whole point of HBO, Cinemax, etc. is that they are <i>not</i> broadcast TV, and do not have to abide by the same regulations. If a consumer finds that channel, or its programs, to be "indecent", they simply do not have to pay for the service, and it goes away.
<center><IMG SRC="http://members.aol.com/darkmoonchild23/images/the_brain_magnet.jpg" alt="Are you pondering what I'm pondering?" height=250 width=250></center><br />
<br />
<marquee behavior=alternate> <A href="mailto:[email protected]"><center><i>"ARE YOU PONDERING WHAT I'M PONDERING?"</i></center></a></marquee><br /><a href="aim:goim?ScreenName=DarkMoonchild23&Message=NARF!!!!!"><center>I think so, Brain...</center></a><br /><i><font color=4e4e4e>I'll conquer the world long before Kingpin ever finds "Pinky"</i></font><br /><font color=white><b><i>Now, I must return to the Lab to prepare for tomorrow night...</b></i></font><font color=4d4d4d size=-5>
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Sex With Sam - by ResidualBitterness - 02-12-2004, 04:31 PM
Sex With Sam - by The Brain - 02-12-2004, 06:12 PM
Sex With Sam - by ResidualBitterness - 02-12-2004, 06:28 PM
Sex With Sam - by header - 02-12-2004, 06:36 PM
Sex With Sam - by ResidualBitterness - 02-12-2004, 08:24 PM
Sex With Sam - by header - 02-12-2004, 08:31 PM
Sex With Sam - by Topper Harley - 02-12-2004, 08:41 PM
Sex With Sam - by header - 02-12-2004, 08:43 PM
Sex With Sam - by Topper Harley - 02-12-2004, 08:49 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)