03-19-2004, 04:05 AM
Its not really the story that pisses me off its a certain line out of the article.
How horrendously vague is that. First off isent the FCC a government organization? Why would it have anything to do with "God's divinity". I really just don't understand how anyone could be fined previously under those terms. It just makes no sense anymore. So would a atheist be fined under those old rules?
Quote:the commission previously equated profanity with language challenging God's divinity.
How horrendously vague is that. First off isent the FCC a government organization? Why would it have anything to do with "God's divinity". I really just don't understand how anyone could be fined previously under those terms. It just makes no sense anymore. So would a atheist be fined under those old rules?