The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$bottomlinks_returncontent - Line: 6 - File: global.php(1070) : eval()'d code PHP 8.4.12 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 157 errorHandler->error
/global.php(1070) : eval()'d code 6 errorHandler->error_callback
/global.php 1070 eval
/showthread.php 28 require_once



YourMomsBox! › Other Stuff › Jock Itch v
Belts possibly returning

Rate Thread
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Belts possibly returning
Flock of Moosen Offline
Posting Freak
*****
Posts: 4,170
Threads: 288
Joined: Apr 2003
#12
05-08-2003, 08:09 AM
Well, it looks like it's only one out of the two shows that feels like doing the right thing.

I was hoping as a "rebuttal" to RAW's decision they would come up with a secondary belt for Smackdown as well, but after reading the spoilers it appears as if they aren't going that route. Well, not yet anyway.

Guess they think the Cruiserweight title is sufficient. Rolleyes
<center>[Image: FOM.jpg]</center>
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Belts possibly returning - by Flock of Moosen - 05-05-2003, 06:42 AM
Belts possibly returning - by Ronin - 05-05-2003, 01:11 PM
Belts possibly returning - by Cluster F - 05-05-2003, 02:29 PM
Belts possibly returning - by HydratedPeach - 05-05-2003, 11:43 PM
Belts possibly returning - by JimmyBlueEyes - 05-06-2003, 12:02 AM
Belts possibly returning - by FollowThisLogic - 05-06-2003, 01:11 AM
Belts possibly returning - by HydratedPeach - 05-06-2003, 01:58 AM
Belts possibly returning - by IrishAlkey - 05-06-2003, 02:46 AM
Belts possibly returning - by JimmyBlueEyes - 05-06-2003, 03:02 AM
Belts possibly returning - by HydratedPeach - 05-06-2003, 03:29 AM
Belts possibly returning - by Tenbatsuzen - 05-07-2003, 02:27 PM
Belts possibly returning - by Flock of Moosen - 05-08-2003, 08:09 AM

Forum Jump:


Recently Browsing 1 Guest(s)

Contact | YourMomsBox! | Top | | Archive | RSS