CDIH

Full Version: Bond...James Blond
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
eh...

Quote:[Image: danielcraigPA111005_100x110.jpg]

It's James Blond
By Nicole Lampert, Daily Mail, Showbusiness Editor
11 October 2005

He has just proved his ladykilling credentials by seducing Sienna Miller from under the nose of his friend, Jude Law.

Now Daniel Craig is about to become the biggest seducer of all - Ian Fleming's James Bond.

The actor, who found fame as Geordie in the BBC series Our Friends in the North in 1996, got the job after an 18-month mission to replace Pierce Brosnan.

Scores of others, including Law himself, Ewan McGregor, Colin Farrell and Orlando Bloom, were considered but rejected.

In the end a shortlist of two emerged - Craig and newcomer Henry Cavill. The pair were auditioned again and tried on tuxedos to see how they would look in the quintessential Bond clothing.

Craig, 37, whose choice will be confirmed by producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G Wilson later this week, will be the sixth Bond, but the first blond.

He will star in the 21st Bond film, based on Ian Fleming's first book Casino Royale.

Craig has said he does not like the fact that the films are more about gadgets than feelings.

He added: 'It's a big machine and it makes a lot of money - so why would you change something that makes a lot of money?'

I dunno who this guy is, but Pierce's shoes will be hard to fill - sure noone was as good as Connery but a blond Bond? Seems gimmicky to me.

link here
he looks like the guy who gives james his gadgets....wait...isnt that the guy who gave austin powers his gadgets???
at a glance, yeah it looks like that Basil dude (I'm too lazy to look up his real name).

there were rumors that Cleese wasn't going to reprise the Q role either.
i havent cared about bond since connery left.
the first 2 with Pierce are great IMO, the roger moore stuff was all campy, but fitting for the time.

The last two, especially this last one with halle berry, were crap.
roger moore wasnt awful.
Connery was best.

after that its just hollywood sqeezing blood from a stone.
The whole series is tired and needs more then a new Bond. They could use some new material instead of rehashing and destroying the originals.
ok roger moore was good
roger moore sucked. he made it too jokey. the new bond should have been clive owen.

michael york was basil.
I agree - way too campy.
it wasnt moore that made it campy, it was the writing.

yeah, he wasnt up to connery. but the man with the golden gun and live and let die wasnt awful.

Will the Casino Royale remake ever happen?
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0381061/">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0381061/</a><!-- m -->
roger moore was better than timothy dalton but both sucked ass.
dogshit is better than Timothy Dalton.
BRING BACK GEORGE LAZENBY!!!
i dont like this guy. isn't bond supposed to be all tall dark & handsome? the blonde doen't do it for me. no good.
I put Lazenby right behind connery and brosnan but light years ahead of moore and dalton.
<3
maybe they'll dye his hair
bond movies have been garbage for years. who the fuck cares who plays him...the movie will suck either way
yeah, can't wait to see what those wacky ruskies are up to this time!
Pages: 1 2