| 
		
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 23,474 
	Threads: 828 
	Joined: Jan 2002
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		Quote:And again, no one ever proved that Iraq didn't have WMD.  By definition, you can't prove that something doesn't exist.  Just because no one has found anything doesn't mean that they didn't have them at some point.  
this is just sad. we also havent found bags of fairy dust and oompa loompas, doesnt mean he didnt have them at some point.
	 
I love him. He's like those happy old people who become known for sitting by the side of a busy street and waving to passing cars. People drive by regularly and beep just to see him and get him to wave to them. 
That's just like our Arpi... except he doesn't wave or anything. He just says mean things to you.
 GonzoStyle Wrote:I pledge my undying love for Arpi, any retraction of this undying love is to be ignored.Nominated for," 2005 poster of the year", by 4 out of 6 mods! 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 23,479 
	Threads: 708 
	Joined: Jan 2002
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		My main problem is, we all know that WMD's were not the reason to go to war. Bush didnt have to play the WMD card. It hurts his credibility to make statements he doesn't know he can back up.
	 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 16,134 
	Threads: 623 
	Joined: Feb 2002
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		I'm not using that argument saying that there were WMDs.  I'm leaning towards no.  If we were able to find Sadam, it shouldn't be more difficult to find a giant warchest of nuclear weapons.  
 My point was that someone in this thread said that it has been proven that there were no WMDs.  That's just wrong.  You can't prove something doesn't exist.
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 23,479 
	Threads: 708 
	Joined: Jan 2002
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		Can Bush prove that God is on his side?
	 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 3,491 
	Threads: 147 
	Joined: Mar 2002
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		How anyone could vote for Bush in light of this shit is truly beyond me.
	 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 23,474 
	Threads: 828 
	Joined: Jan 2002
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		Galt Wrote:My point was that someone in this thread said that it has been proven that there were no WMDs.  That's just wrong.  You can't prove something doesn't exist. exactly the reason i say we continue to look for the oompa loompas.
	 
I love him. He's like those happy old people who become known for sitting by the side of a busy street and waving to passing cars. People drive by regularly and beep just to see him and get him to wave to them. 
That's just like our Arpi... except he doesn't wave or anything. He just says mean things to you.
 GonzoStyle Wrote:I pledge my undying love for Arpi, any retraction of this undying love is to be ignored.Nominated for," 2005 poster of the year", by 4 out of 6 mods! 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 23,479 
	Threads: 708 
	Joined: Jan 2002
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		DADDY I WANT AN OOMPA LOOMPA NOW!
	 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 6,915 
	Threads: 89 
	Joined: Jan 2002
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		Galt's opinion is retarded.
	 
<center> ![[Image: post-13-05352-iasig.jpg]](http://www.cdih.net/non-cgi/uploads/post-13-05352-iasig.jpg)  
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 23,479 
	Threads: 708 
	Joined: Jan 2002
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 6,915 
	Threads: 89 
	Joined: Jan 2002
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		Stop that!
	 
<center> ![[Image: post-13-05352-iasig.jpg]](http://www.cdih.net/non-cgi/uploads/post-13-05352-iasig.jpg)  
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 4,196 
	Threads: 76 
	Joined: Jan 2002
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		Question: if Sadam didn't have WMD what exactly is he under arrest for?
	 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 6,915 
	Threads: 89 
	Joined: Jan 2002
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		Being a meany.
	 
<center> ![[Image: post-13-05352-iasig.jpg]](http://www.cdih.net/non-cgi/uploads/post-13-05352-iasig.jpg)  
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 16,134 
	Threads: 623 
	Joined: Feb 2002
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		You can't cite sources of opinions.
	 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 23,479 
	Threads: 708 
	Joined: Jan 2002
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 679 
	Threads: 5 
	Joined: Jul 2002
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		Black Lazerus Wrote:Question: if Sadam didn't have WMD what exactly is he under arrest for? I guess using gas on the kurds and running a tyranical dictatorship aren't enough
	 
<center>E-A-G-L-E-S</center>
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 6,915 
	Threads: 89 
	Joined: Jan 2002
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		My gas could get me locked up.
	 
<center> ![[Image: post-13-05352-iasig.jpg]](http://www.cdih.net/non-cgi/uploads/post-13-05352-iasig.jpg)  
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 4,196 
	Threads: 76 
	Joined: Jan 2002
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		Velociti Wrote:Black Lazerus Wrote:Question: if Sadam didn't have WMD what exactly is he under arrest for?I guess using gas on the kurds and running a tyranical dictatorship aren't enough China runs the same kind of govenment, i don't see us invading them and asking for the leader to be arrested.
	 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 23,479 
	Threads: 708 
	Joined: Jan 2002
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		Quote:I guess using gas on the kurds and running a tyranical dictatorship aren't enough 
I would have been fine if the president was more honest about his reasons for going to war.
	 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 10,133 
	Threads: 528 
	Joined: Oct 2002
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		Quote:And again, no one ever proved that Iraq didn't have WMD.   
The way the UN worded it over 10 years ago, and cited in every resolution since, no one but Iraq ever had to prove Iraq had weapons.  In fact, the burden of proof was put upon Saddam Hussein to prove that he didn't have any weapons, and he couldn't do that.  
 
I don't understand why the administration lied about the threat posed by Iraq, nor do I understand why they had to make it seem like Iraq had all these weapons.
	 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 17,123 
	Threads: 741 
	Joined: Jan 2002
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		Quote:I don't understand why the administration lied about the threat posed by Iraq, nor do I understand why they had to make it seem like Iraq had all these weapons.  
because the best way to get a post-9/11 america behind war is to make it seem like it was linked to terrorism
	 
<center><img src="http://resized.filevend.com/anon/6d4hOYr3.gif"></center>
 |