The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$bottomlinks_returncontent - Line: 6 - File: global.php(1070) : eval()'d code PHP 8.4.12 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 157 errorHandler->error
/global.php(1070) : eval()'d code 6 errorHandler->error_callback
/global.php 1070 eval
/showthread.php 28 require_once



YourMomsBox! › Other Stuff › Visual Entertainment v
"Playmakers" no more

Rate Thread
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"Playmakers" no more
Hasegawa Offline
Senior Member
****
Posts: 452
Threads: 56
Joined: Jul 2003
#6
02-05-2004, 12:06 AM
One obvious reason why ESPN reacted so quickly by cancelling it was how well of a business partner the NFL is to ESPN. Though I would have liked them to call the NFL's bluff to see what would stir up between the two.
<!-- Start CGISpy.com Random Image Code -->
<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=DynamiteK"><br>
<!-- End CGISpy.com Random Image Code -->
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
\"Playmakers\" no more - by Flock of Moosen - 02-04-2004, 09:32 PM
\"Playmakers\" no more - by Rooner - 02-04-2004, 09:33 PM
\"Playmakers\" no more - by Faceman - 02-04-2004, 09:37 PM
\"Playmakers\" no more - by Hasegawa - 02-04-2004, 09:44 PM
\"Playmakers\" no more - by Flock of Moosen - 02-04-2004, 09:50 PM
\"Playmakers\" no more - by Hasegawa - 02-05-2004, 12:06 AM
\"Playmakers\" no more - by Sloats - 02-05-2004, 03:23 AM
\"Playmakers\" no more - by Flock of Moosen - 02-06-2004, 07:52 AM

Forum Jump:


Recently Browsing 1 Guest(s)

Contact | YourMomsBox! | Top | | Archive | RSS