12-22-2008, 11:07 AM
Steven Jackson: 223 att, 881 yards. Star? No.
Marc Bulger: 57% compl, 10 td, 13int Star? No.
Jamal Lewis: 256 att, 906 yds, 5 td Star? No.
JaMarcus Russel doesn't even qualify with even these guys.. and again, the experience thing.
Donald Driver: 62 rec, 884 yds, 4td Star? Not exactly, but decent.
Gonzalez and Rodgers are solid, I'll give you that.
But please, go on.
As for Palmer, none of his injuries were year-ending. He couldn't heal because he didn't rehab. And you don't think when the Packers get up by 14 or so, Rodgers isn't going to come out? And Green Bay's backs have been hurt all year.. Not expecting much of a show from them. But passing on Detroit shouldn't be a problem. In any case, I didn't say they wouldn't be starting.. but I wouldn't be expecting a full game out of most of Green Bay's first-stringers.
Marc Bulger: 57% compl, 10 td, 13int Star? No.
Jamal Lewis: 256 att, 906 yds, 5 td Star? No.
JaMarcus Russel doesn't even qualify with even these guys.. and again, the experience thing.
Donald Driver: 62 rec, 884 yds, 4td Star? Not exactly, but decent.
Gonzalez and Rodgers are solid, I'll give you that.
But please, go on.
As for Palmer, none of his injuries were year-ending. He couldn't heal because he didn't rehab. And you don't think when the Packers get up by 14 or so, Rodgers isn't going to come out? And Green Bay's backs have been hurt all year.. Not expecting much of a show from them. But passing on Detroit shouldn't be a problem. In any case, I didn't say they wouldn't be starting.. but I wouldn't be expecting a full game out of most of Green Bay's first-stringers.
Where would we be without the agitators of the world attaching the electrodes of knowledge to the nipples of ignorance?