Everytime someone fucks up and says or does something racial insensitve, this cunt chimes in. Eveytime it's the same, the person who fucks up apologizes and he's like oohh that's not enough! Who made this guy the representative of the black race? Why does anyone care what he thinks? And what the hell does this guy do for a living? He's not a Congressman or nor does he hold any political office as far as I know. Where does he get his money? Let's take a look at that and see what we find, shall we?

Sharpton on Kramer Situation: http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/TV/11/22...index.html

hey buddy!!

I burn hours on these dumb games. They kick ass! Here's some of my favorites:

Furthest I got on this little Bumper Pool Car Game was Level 11: http://www.break.com/games/bumper_pool.html
Once you get used to using the control arrows it gets easier but no matter how good you think you are it's still a challenge and can be frustrating as hell.

Best score on this Mini Putt-Putt is 20: http://www.break.com/games/miniputt1.html
I will not rest until I get a perfect score!

I also love this Turkey Shoot'Em Up. There a glitch, if you can get far enough, where you can keep playing indefinitely if you so choose: http://www.break.com/games/turkeyshot.html
Can you figure out the cheat? I won't tell! Nah Nah Nah-Nah Nah!

Death will be hear in no time!

Btw, Putt-Putt Proof:

My boss asked me to help him with a divorce case he is working on cause he's handling some big personal injury case.

In my research I have found that cousins can actually get married in ny, yet a ships captain can not marry people.

crazy!

Lets all please stop posting insults and comments to eachother, until we get a run down of our entire histories. So we don't say anything offensive that will result in our myspace emails being spammed with whining tirades.

So, my name is Eddie, i'm 27 and a sagitarius.

Interweb: Web sites not liable for posts by others
By Eric Simon Filed under: Interweb
Posted on Tue Nov 21, 2006 at 09:11:04 PM EST

Not baseball-related, but apropos nonetheless.

The California state supreme court handed down a ruling today that ostensibly gives website operators carte blanche to publish whatever defamatory content they wish, provided they are actually just reprinting someone elses defamatory content. A woman in San Diego was sued by two doctors for reprinting an e-mail that accused one of said doctors of stalking a Canadian radio producer and included scathing missives -- allegedly false ones -- aimed at both doctors. The decision is a huge victory for freedom of online expression, but it also puts added emphasis on self-regulation.

Ilena Rosenthal had technology juggernauts Amazon.com, Yahoo!, Google, Microsoft, eBay and America Online in her corner, obviously aware that their own collective asses could be exposed to libel suits should the court have ruled in favor of the doctors. This case is of particular interest to me because I operate two web sites that are heavily community-driven and I am always aware of the potential for someone other than myself to publish content that wasn't intended to be published.

While I am a strong advocate for the freedoms of expression and information, I applaud this ruling with a grain of trepidation, because in the back of my mind I fear that it may set a precedent that could open the floodgates for libelous loopholes of all sorts. Let's say that I wanted to unleash a torrent of expletives, slander and false accusations about a particular ballplayer. What's to stop me from writing an anonymous e-mail via any number of freely-available internet e-mail providers (Gmail, Hotmail, Yahoo! Mail, to name a few), address it to one of my legitimate e-mail accounts, and include said expletives, slander, etc. I could presumably then publish that e-mail on a website, crediting said anonymous source.

I'm not suggesting that this ruling will invite a widespread deterioration of respect and common decency across the internet. Just that it could, and we would all be the worse for it. As it stands, I am pleased that this case would seem to protect myself and other webmasters whose good intentions are often at risk of exploitation at the hands of ill-intentioned trolls and the like. A win for us, but I'm sure this isn't the last we have heard of the "freedom of online expression".

I need new music in my collection.

What are your top 5 most played songs in iTunes (or whatever mp3 shit you use)

So I’m at work yesterday and came across what apparently was a fairly large cricket. Not even thinking a second about it, I stomped on it and grinded it into the ground. You would have thought I crushed a newborn with the outcry around the office.

No you can’t kill a cricket, it’s bad luck! You’re supposed to set them free! Noooooooo! You fucking maniac! Murderer!

Why??? As far as I’m concerned it’s just a loud, annoying cockroach. Usually the only way I can even tell the difference is if it jumps. You’re not even a fucking Asian, why would you adopt some random foreign superstition? They also believe suicide is a noble thing over there, so why not adopt that? Go eat some octopus cock while you’re at it, too. These are the same assholes that will pinch people that don’t wear green on St. Patrick’s Day, even though the closest they’ve ever come to Ireland is when they ordered a baked potato at Wendy’s.

I might as well amuse myself being I'm one of like 5 consistent posters here recently.
15 minutes in...celtic and man utd. tied at 0
Benfica 2 fc kopenhagen 0

Porto 2 CSKA Moscow 0 F.

I don't want my family anywhere near me. Or any of that disgusting food.